RISK MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THEIR IMPACT ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY

  • Yogi Ahmad Yani Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam IAIN Kerinci
  • Ahmad Yani Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam IAIN Kerinci
  • Novia
Keywords: Risk Management, Investment Decision Making, Operational Performance, Corporate Sustainability, ESG

Abstract

In a dynamic and uncertain global business landscape, risk management and investment decision-making have become fundamental pillars for optimal operational performance and corporate sustainability. This study comprehensively analyzes existing literature to construct an understanding of how the integration of these two disciplines affects operational performance and sustainability, as well as identifying trends, challenges, and research gaps. This research uses a comprehensive literature review approach, identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing reputable scientific journal articles, industry reports, and other relevant publications from 2020 to 2025. Data was collected through systematic searches of academic databases using keywords related to risk management, investment, operational performance, and sustainability. The analysis was conducted through thematic and narrative synthesis to identify patterns, gaps, and best practice recommendations. The results of the study show that risk management plays a crucial role in investment decision-making, directly affecting profitability and operational efficiency. The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into risk management and investment is increasingly important to promote corporate sustainability, where effective risk management can influence investment choices and contribute to stronger financial performance. Despite positive trends in the growth of the risk management and sustainable investment market in Southeast Asia, significant challenges remain, including a lack of ESG standardization and reporting, as well as complex cyber risk and human resource risk management. Effective integration between risk management and investment decision-making is essential for operational performance and long-term sustainability. However, challenges related to standardization and reporting require collaborative efforts from policymakers, practitioners, and academics. Suggestions for future research include studies that quantify the specific impact of integrating risk management and sustainable investment on operational and sustainability performance metrics across various sectors, particularly in emerging markets such as the property sector in Indonesia, with a focus on climate risk and digitalization.

References

Abdul Aziz, N. A., Manab, N. A., & Othman, S. N. (2016). Barriers and drivers for the integration of ESG into risk management: Evidence from Malaysian firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 187-197.
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). The effect of mandatory ESG disclosure on firm valuation. Harvard Business School Working Paper.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework. Bank for International Settlements.
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2018). Investments (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED).
Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. University of Oxford, Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2017). Enterprise risk management—Integrating with strategy and performance. COSO.
Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation: Tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Davenport, T. H. (2013). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press.
Deloitte. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Responding to risk and building resilience. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
Ernst & Young (EY). (2022). The sustainable value creation paradox: How to embed ESG into strategy. EY Global Limited.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2021). GRI universal standards 2021. GRI.
Graham, B., & Dodd, D. L. (1934). Security analysis. McGraw-Hill.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Hull, J. C. (2018). Risk management and financial institutions (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). Risk management—Guidelines (ISO 31000:2018). ISO.
Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2002). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1228-1263.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. ESRC Methods Programme.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
PwC. (2021). COVID-19 and the future of risk management: Building resilience for a new era. PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Rappaport, A. (1998). Creating shareholder value: A guide for managers and investors. Free Press.
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 350, g7647.
Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best-practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770.
Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Johnston, R. (2019). Operations management (9th ed.). Pearson.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-based management knowledge through systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI). (2018). The physical risks of climate change: A guide for companies. UNEP FI.
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press.
Published
2025-12-08
Section
Articles