Communicative Action or Strategic Communication? A Habermasian Analysis of the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi

  • Khoirul Umami UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Muhammad Fathur Rozaq UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Keywords: communicative action., ecological exegesis, Habermas, Ministry of Religious Affairs;, state communication, Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi

Abstract

This article examines how the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs constructs ecological responsibility through its official publication Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi: Membangun Kesadaran Ekoteologis Berbasis Al-Qur’an. This book was written amid rapid industrial expansion and a deepening environmental crisis in Indonesia. Against this backdrop, examining how the Ministry of Religious Affairs, as a state institution, constructs ideal ecological foundations from the Qur’an becomes critical. Rather than evaluating the theological content of the tafsir, the study investigates its communicative function within Indonesia’s contemporary environmental and political context. Drawing on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, particularly the concepts of communicative rationality, strategic communication, and the colonization of the lifeworld, this research employs qualitative critical discourse analysis of the tafsir’s institutional paratext and selected ecological interpretations. The analysis is situated within the historical-political context of Indonesia’s expanding extractive development, including mining policy reforms and the growing involvement of religious institutions in environmental governance. The findings show that the tafsir consistently frames ecological degradation through the ethical vocabulary of amānah, khalīfah, and individual moral responsibility while only selectively acknowledging the structural role of political authority and extractive capital. Although the text occasionally recognizes state and corporate actors as contributors to environmental destruction, its proposed solutions remain centered on moral exhortation rather than institutional accountability or democratic deliberation. Consequently, the tafsir occupies an intermediate communicative position between communicative action and strategic communication, preserving religion’s ethical authority while simultaneously narrowing structural ecological critique into a discourse of moral reform. This study contributes to scholarship on state-sponsored Qur’anic interpretation by demonstrating how official ecological exegesis participates in the communicative governance of environmental crises. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia mengonstruksi tanggung jawab ekologis melalui Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi: Membangun Kesadaran Ekoteologis Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Buku ini ditulis di tengah pesatnya ekspansi industri dan memuncaknya krisis lingkungan di Indonesia. Berangkat dari konteks tersebut, mengkaji bagaimana Kementerian Agama, sebagai institusi negara, membangun fondasi ekologis yang ideal berdasarkan Al-Qur’an menjadi krusial. Berbeda dari penelitian yang berfokus pada substansi teologis tafsir, studi ini menempatkan tafsir sebagai praktik komunikasi negara yang beroperasi dalam konteks politik dan ekologis Indonesia kontemporer. Dengan menggunakan teori tindakan komunikatif Jürgen Habermas, khususnya konsep rasionalitas komunikatif, komunikasi strategis, dan kolonisasi dunia kehidupan (lifeworld), penelitian ini menerapkan analisis wacana kritis terhadap parateks institusional serta penafsiran ayat-ayat ekologis dalam tafsir tersebut. Analisis dilakukan dengan mempertimbangkan konteks historis-politik Indonesia yang ditandai oleh ekspansi pembangunan ekstraktif, reformasi kebijakan pertambangan, dan meningkatnya keterlibatan institusi keagamaan dalam tata kelola sumber daya alam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tafsir secara konsisten membingkai krisis ekologis melalui konsep amanah, khalifah, dan tanggung jawab moral individu, sementara faktor-faktor struktural seperti negara dan kapital ekstraktif hanya diakui secara terbatas. Meskipun beberapa bagian mengkritik peran penguasa dan aktor ekonomi dalam kerusakan lingkungan, solusi yang ditawarkan tetap berpusat pada seruan moral, bukan akuntabilitas institusional maupun deliberasi publik. Dengan demikian, Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi menempati posisi komunikatif yang berada di antara tindakan komunikatif dan komunikasi strategis. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa tafsir resmi negara tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai produk penafsiran keagamaan, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen komunikasi yang membentuk relasi antara agama, negara, dan tata kelola krisis ekologis di Indonesia.

References

Abisono, Fatih Gama. (2024). “Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Perubahan Iklim: Transformasi Negara Pembangunan Dan Agenda Transisi Energi Di Indonesia.” Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 15 (1): 95–118.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. (2025). “Beyond Instrumentalization: Lived Religion, Politics, and Justice in Indonesian Muslim Environmentalisms.” Studia Islamika 32 (3): 439–66. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v32i3.46652.

Duvenhage, Pieter N. J. (2024). “Reflections on Habermas’s Discourse Ethics.” Verbum et Ecclesia 45 (1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.3009.

Fadllurrahman, Moh, Umiatu Rohmah, Nur Arfiyah Febriani, and Badru Tamam. (2026). “Dekonstruksi Antroposentrisme Tafsir Klasik dalam Tafsir Ayat-ayat Ekologi Kementerian Agama RI.” Al-Afham: Journal of Islamic Studies 3 (1): 76–101. https://doi.org/10.62509/ajis.v3i1.411.

Fardiansyah, Mhd Azri, and Iril Admizal. (2023). “Wacana Moderasi Beragama Dalam Bingkai Ekologi: Implementasi Konservasi Lingkungan Dalam Qs al-Baqarah Ayat 30 Sebagai Upaya Penguatan Sikap Moderat.” Qudwah Qur’aniyah: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 1 (2): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.30631/qudwahquraniyah.v1i2.2114.

Fathurokhmah, Fita, and Ellya Pratiwi. (2025). “Digital Discourse on Worship Restrictions: Communicative Actions of Religious Institutions during COVID-19.” In Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion, Education, Health, Science, and Technology. CRC Press.

Firdaus, Reno, and Asfar Hamidi Siregar. (2025). “Nahdlatul Ulama and Environmental Engagement in Coastal Bengkalis amid Ecological Crisis.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI) 6 (1): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v6i1.7518.

Fuchs, Christian. (2026). “Reason and Communication: Jürgen Habermas’s Legacy for Media and Communication Studies.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 24 (1): 54–71. https://doi.org/10.31269/7112an90.

Ghazali, Rusman. (2026). “Understanding Environmental Ethics and Practices in Indonesia.” Discover Sustainability 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02569-9.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1985a). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Volume 1. Beacon press.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1985b). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeword and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2. Beacon press.

Hardi, Irsan, Ghalieb Mutig Idroes, Teuku Rizky Noviandy, Aga Maulana, and Rinaldi Idroes. (2026). “Mining and Environment: The Ecological Impact of Bauxite and Copper Production in Indonesia.” World Development Sustainability 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2026.100329.

Hidayat, Mansur. (2023). “Islamic Eco-Theology: Religious Narratives in the Climate Crisis in Indonesia.” Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies 2 (2): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.51214/biis.v2i2.678.

Hidayati, Nur. (2021). “Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020: Penderitaan Berkelanjutan Bagi Rakyat Dan Lingkungan Hidup.” Kuasa Oligarki Atas Minerba Indonesia, 26–51.

Husain, Mulvi Affan. (2025). “Mainstreaming Ecotheology: Designing Responsive Program Policies at the South Sulawesi Province Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs.” AMUYA: INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS 1 (2): 337–64. https://doi.org/10.61860/amuya.v1i2.24.

Kim, Sung Min, J. B. Banawiratma, and Dicky Sofjan. (2020). “Religious Pluralism Discourse in Public Sphere of Indonesia: A Critical Application of Communicative Action Theory to Inter-Religious Dialogue.” Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 10 (2): 158–88. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v10i2.1307.

Maulidatin, Alik, Nur Chanifah, and Indah Dwi Qurbani. (2026). “Legal Conflicts in Granting Mining Permits to Religious Organizations in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 11 (2): 264–85. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v11i2.13591.

Miliasari, Pamela Setya, Muhammad Adnan, and Wahid Abdulrahman. (2025). “Challenges for Religious Organizations in Realizing Ecological Justice in the Midst of Mining Legalization Indonesia.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1537 (1): 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1537/1/012060.

Muhammad, Muhammad, M. Zubad Nurul Yaqin, Fakhris Khusnu Reza Mahfud, and Fahd Mohana S. Alahmadi. (2024). “Freedom That Is Not Absolute: Ecological Ethics and Human-Nature Relationship in the Qur’an.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 22 (4): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5821.

Muthia, Alma. (2024). “Analisis Strategi Komunikasi Kementerian Agama Ri Dalam Mendiseminasikan Program Moderasi Beragama Terhadap Peningkatan Indeks Kerukunan Umat Beragama 2020-2024.” Masters, Universitas Hasanuddin. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/45070/.

Nugroho, Ahmad, Aan Eko Widiarto, and Indah Dwi Qurbani. (2026). “Green Constitution in the Indonesian Perspective: Reconstruction of the 1945 Constitution for Sustainable Development.” Multidisciplinary Science Journal 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026024.

Ramadan, Attar Hikmahtiar, Emenda Sembiring, Benno Rahardyan, and Hadi Kardhana. (2026). “Mapping Mismanaged Plastic Waste in Indonesia: Subdistrict-Level Analysis through Material Flow from Sources to the Environment.” Scientific Reports 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41849-w.

Rasyid, M. Harun Al, Taufik Warman Mahfuzh, Munirah Munirah, and Nor Faridatunnisa. (2024). “Konsep Ekoteologi Dalam Al-Qur’an: Kajian Tafsir Kemetrian Agama Republik Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Autekologi.” Syams: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.23971/cdwezx94.

Reflita, Imam Arif Purnawan, Idrianto Faishal, et al. (2025). Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Ekologi, Membangun Kesadaran Ekoteologis Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Edited by Abdul Aziz Sidqi and Misbahul. Kementerian Agama RI.

Rochmawati, Nur Anis. (2025). “Ecotheology in Action: The Strategic Role of Religious Identity in FNKSDA’s Environmental Movement.” Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif 20 (1): 185–206.

Rohma, Masitoh Nur. (2025). “Navigating Digital Activism on Environmental Movement: Mining License Grants to Religious Organizations in Indonesia.” Insignia: Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 184–205. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2024.11.2.13533.

Saputro, Yudananto Ramadan, and Luthfi Makhasin. (2024). “Analisis Ekonomi Politik: Revisi Atas Kebijakan Mineral Dan Batu Bara Era Jokowi.” Al-Ijtimai: International Journal of Government and Social Science 9 (2): 46–61.

Satriawan, Iwan, Indah Dwi Qurbani, and Muhammad Fathi. (2025). “Green Constitution in Practice: Environmental Policy Analysis During the Jokowi Era.” E3S Web Conf. 660. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566002006.

Sudarmin, Andi B. Mutmainnah, Ulil Amri, Riska Amelia, Rismawati Rismawati, and Ajmalunnas M. (2025). “Fiqh Al-Bī’ah and Mining Concessions: NU and Muhammadiyah’s Legal Responses.” Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review 4 (2): 117–28. https://doi.org/10.64016/parewasaraq.v4i2.49.

Ubab, Alwi Jamalulel. (2022). “Penerapan Tafsir Ekologis Dalam Usaha Merawat Lingkungan Pesantren.” The International Journal of Pegon : Islam Nusantara Civilization 8 (02): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.51925/inc.v8i02.69.

Wijsen, Frans. (2025). “How Green Is Green Islam? Religious Environmentalism and Public Policy in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 32 (3): 421–37. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v32i3.46654.

Yunus, Muh, Zulkifli Aspan, Resi Resi, Maskun Maskun, Rasyida Usman, and Azlan Thamrin. (2025). “Mining Permits for Religion Organizations in Indonesia: Public Interest vs Islamic Ethics.” Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement 8 (2): 617–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v8i2.32999.

Zuhri, Syaifudin. (2021). “Regimented Islamophobia : Islam, State, and Governmentality in Indonesia.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 9 (2): 387–422. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i2.8249.

Zulkarnain, and Muhazir. (2025). Living Together in Difference: Enhancing Intercultural Communication through Religious Moderation in Post-Conflict Aceh | MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial. 8 (2). https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/muharrik/article/view/7979.

Published
2026-09-03